What is news, and how is information different
from news? These two questions were implied in a recent interview on ABCs' Four
Corners program when New York Times Bureau chief Dean Baquet suggested that
Wikileaks was a provider of information, not news. However what Mr Baquet may
or may not of realised is there are ethical issues such a distinction between
news and information might raise? For example what about the role of
journalists in providing sound information and the publics right to know this
information, or conversely the importance of keeping certain facts hidden to
protect a countries national security?
However it is not the intention of this analytical
essay to provide the answers to any ethical dilemmas that arise from the above
statement, but rather to analyse any issues that may occur by arguing that news
and information are different. This will be achieved by attempting to answer
the two overriding questions that develop from analysing the above statement
made by Mr Baquet. They are: 1. How do you differentiate between news and
information, and 2. what ethical considerations might develop in doing so?
Subsequently to accomplish this the essay will be
divided into four parts. First it will analyse news and information separately
by attempting to define them. This will be achieved by analysing news in more
depth with the help of some scholarly interpretations. Secondly it will then
attempt to define information by also looking at some scholarly definitions in
detail. Thirdly it will look at what truly differentiates news from information
by discussing Mastertons' key news values. Finally it will consider the ethical
issues that arise when analysing news and information by using the MEAA code of
ethics as a reference. Furthermore, these four points will
be backed by scholarly evidence, quotes, and statistics which will help to give
evidentiary support to this essay’s argument.
Firstly, news by definition is difficult to
specify. The original meaning of 'newes' was first referenced in 1551 when
it meant 'novelties'. A more recent
attempt at defining news was made by Philip Graham a former publisher of the
Washington Post who said, “News is the first rough draft of history” (Lamble
2011, p.34). Another good definition of news was made by John Bogart, city
editor of The New York Sun. He said “When a dog bites a man, that is not
news because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, it's news” (Lamble
2011 p.35). Perhaps one of the best definitions has come from US journalism
educator Melvin Mencher who said there are two general guidelines. They are: 1.
news is information about a break from the normal flow of events, and 2. news
is information people need to make sound decisions about their lives (Lamble
2011 p.35). Therefore according to these
definitions news could be summarised as a type of story about anything new or out
of the ordinary that helps people to make informed decisions on their lives.
Secondly, information is also a word that is
difficult to define. Just like news its meaning is very broad. However this has
not stopped academics from attempting to define it. According to Webster's dictionary information is: “The
communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence”. Another common
definition of information is: “One or more statements or facts that are
received by a human and that have some form of worth to the recipient” (Losee
1997, p.255). Another more detailed and complex definition of information that
was provided by the journal of the American society for information science
states that “information is produced by all processes, and it is the values of
characteristics in the processes output that are information” (Losee 1997,
p.256) Therefore from these definitions of information it could be surmised
that information is a type of factual commodity that can be bought, sold, given
away, learned or taught by an individual or group of individuals, but generally
only has value to those whom it was intended for.
Consequently while both definitions provided
above help us to create a better understanding of what news and information are
individually, they do not provide a definitive explanation as to what exactly
separates the two from each other. One academic who attempted to differentiate
between the two was J. Lule. He made an excellent observation when he stated,
“News is not presented in the form of news as information, but rather as a
story, a story with characters, a plot, and a theme” (Lule 2001 p.12). However
it was New Zealand journalist and
journalist academic Murray Masterton who made a defining observation after
surveying thousands of journalists in 67 countries around the globe. He came to
the conclusion that there were three essential elements that differentiated
news from information. They are: interest, timeliness and clarity. He said that
news items must interest many people, they must contain new information, and
that it must be presented in a easily understood form (Lamble 2011 p.37).
However Masterton did not stop at interest,
timeliness, and clarity. He further went on to define six more news values that
today’s journalists still use to help them decide if a story is news worthy or
not. They are: significance, proximity, conflict, human interest, novelty, and
prominence. It must be noted that the following six news value definitions have
been condensed significantly as many paragraphs could be written on each one.
However for the purpose of this essay it is only necessary to touch on them
briefly. Consequently significance relates to the number of people who could be
affected by the news story. Proximity relates to events that happen close to
people geographically, as well as events that affect us historically, socially,
and emotionally. Conflict can be anything related to political debates, wars,
neighbourhood disputes, sporting issues, and court reports to name a few. Human
Interest is basically anything of interest that other people may be doing,
whether it be what our neighbours are up to or just the latest gossip on movie
stars. Novelty is anything odd or bizarre that captures our attention, or
something rare and unusual that stands out. Finally prominence relates to
anything famous, well known, powerful or important people may say or do (Lamble
2011 p.37-41). Subsequently by creating these nine news values Masterton has
helped to substantiate the argument that news and information are truly
different commodities.
Fourthly and finally lets look at what
ethical issues arise from making a distinction between news and
information? Clause number one in the
Media Alliance (MEAA) code of ethics states that “journalists must report and
interpret honestly, striving for accuracy, fairness, and disclosure of all
essential facts”. So is Wikileaks being ethical by releasing controversial
information online, or is it simply striving to disclose all essential facts to
the public so they can make informed decisions on their lives? It is plausible to suggest that when Mr
Baquet suggested that Wikileaks was a provider of information not news he may
have meant that Wikileaks is not a true news organisation. However if this is
the case does that make Wikileaks exempt from sticking to a journalistic code
of conduct? Should it be allowed to obtain information illegally and submit it
online for the world to see simply because it is a provider of information, not
news? And even if it could get past this dilemma does this still make it
ethically correct for Wikileaks to be releasing information that could
potentially harm a countries national security? Conversely what about the
publics right to know? Should that not be taken into account as well? Nonetheless regardless of what the critics
and experts say these questions and many more are all questions that have yet
to be properly answered and will be an ongoing problem for a long time into the
foreseeable future.
In conclusion it has been well documented
and proven in the body of this essay that news and information are both
different commodities. News has been defined as a type of story about anything
new or out of the ordinary that helps people to make informed decisions on
their lives. It has three key values that differentiate it from information – interest,
timeliness, and clarity. It also has another six news values that further
separate it from information - significance, proximity, conflict, human
interest, novelty, and prominence. Information has also been defined. It is one or more statements or facts that
are received by a human and that have some form of worth to the recipient. It is also considered the communication or
reception of knowledge or intelligence.
In conclusion this essay has proven in its
argument that there are differences between news and information, and that
these differences create ethical issues that have yet to be fully solved. It
has shown that Wikileaks is a provider
of information, not news, and considered whether this would make it exempt from
certain ethical issues. It has also analysed the implications of broadcasting
controversial information, and whether or not a countries national security
should be more important than the publics right to know. Lastly readers should
consider the fact that there is a long way to go before any of these ethical
issues will be solved to a satisfactory standard.
By Reuben Franklin
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tuchman,
G 1976 'What is News?' PhD Thesis, Griffith University.
Retrieved
20 March 2011, via Google Scholar
Staab,
J 1990, 'The Role of News Factors in News Selection' Downloaded from ejc.sagepub.com at Griffith University on March 23,
2011
Wilkins, L & Patterson, P 1987,
'Risk Analysis and the Construction of News'
viewed 22 March 2011 via Google Scholar
Losee, M 1997, 'A Discipline definition
independent of Information'
Journal of the American Society for
Information Science,
viewed 22 March 2011 Via Google Scholar
Lamble, S 2011, News as it Happens,
Oxford University Press,
South Melbourne Victoria.
Media Alliance Code of Ethics @ www.alliance.org.au/code-of-ethics.html
Lule, J 2001 'Seven master myths in the
news',
Eternal Stories: The mythological role
of journalism, New York,
Guildford Press, Chapter 1, 11-26